Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  78 / 2158 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 78 / 2158 Next Page
Page Background

78

Figure 2.

(A) Building model in Design Builder; (B) External wall model in Design Builder

The same criteria for simulation as used by Pause et al. (2016) was adopted, with a change in

occupational rate and the set point temperature of 25°C was assumed. The thermal properties for

materials (conductivity, specific heat and density) were taken from NBR 15520-2 (ABNT, 2008).

For the envelope, the transmittance value (U) was calculated and verified by Design Builder. The

external walls presented 3.02 W/m².K, internal walls 2,49 W/m².K, roof 2,2 W/m².K and windows,

with green glass (6 mm), 5,8 W/m².K. Finally, the simulation was carried out for the building during

8760 hours and the electricity consumption (in kWh) per year was obtained.

The CO

2eq

emission factors (FCO

2

) adopted for Brazilian electricity generation were taken from the

site of the

Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia

(MCTI, 2016) for the years between 2006 and 2015,

with the adoption of: (1) a minimum factor (FCO

2min

) of 0.025 kgCO

2eq

/kWh (considering the growth

of the share of renewable sources); (2) an average factor (FCO

2med

) of 0.064 kgCO

2eq

/kWh

(considering a scenario close to the recent years, with greater hydraulic participation) and (3) a

maximum factor (FCO

2max

) of 0.135 kgCO

2eq

/kWh (scenario with growth of thermal sources). This

approach allowed to evaluate different possibilities, given a considerable degree of uncertainty of

Brazilian future electrical matrix.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of electricity consumption for the three occupational density scenarios are presented in

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Energy consumption in school