213 Law in Time: Legal Theory & Legal History legal explanation legal actors must reach. The escalation of the viewpoint-scope-timeframe of legal explanation may at times be a match to the need for change of meta-norms of conflict resolution, usually accompanied by changes in the constitutional essentials. Twice in the past, escalation reached the point of paradigm formation, and once of paradigm replacement. Referências AQUINAS, Thomas. Summa Theilogiae . Trad. T. Gilby. Hachette, Reino Unido: Blackfriars, 1972. ARISTOTLE. Nicomachean Ethics . Trad. W.D. Ross. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1995. BARROZO, Paulo. The Great Alliance: History, Reason, and Will in Modern Law. Law and Contemporary Problems , v. 78, n. 1, 6 mar. 2015. BORGES, Jorge Luis. The Theologians. In: BORGES, Jorge Luis. The Aleph and Other Stories 1933-1969 . New York: Bantan Books, 1970. BUNKHORST, Hauke. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions . Evolutionary Perspectives. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2014. 471. p. DELLAMIRANDOLA, Giovanni Pico. Oration on the Dignity of Man . Trad. A. Robert Caponigri. Chicago: Regnery, 1956. DESAUTELS-STEIN, Justin. Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Legal History. In: DUBBER, Markus D.; TOMLINS, Christopher (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Legal History . Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2018. DRETSKE, Fred. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , v. 50, n. 4, p. 783786, 1990. EMERSON, Ralph Waldo. History. In : EMERSON, Ralph Waldo. The Essential Writings of RalphWaldo Emerson . New York: Modern Library, 2000.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjEzNzYz